On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective?
>
Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes
sub-packages.
So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the
qualified ones are for the sub-packages. Is this correct?
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
