Bart Schaefer napsal(a): > We're having a spike right now. Doesn't look much different, though: > > # wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack > 17141 /proc/net/ip_conntrack > # fgrep -cv UNRE /proc/net/ip_conntrack > 1310 What are the upstream link parameters (type, up, down, ...), what's the ping on gateway and 1K ping. David _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: David Hrbác( <hrbac.conf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:02:32 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <6bb609560709100929q344ecad4lf6375fd55a0c6a87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <6bb609560709081703j76cc60e9oc35580a9442feb67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E4DE20.3090803@xxxxxxxxx> <6bb609560709092321x2fd5fd22v5099ddc358c9e349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E4E436.4010003@xxxxxxxxx> <6bb609560709100929q344ecad4lf6375fd55a0c6a87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
- References:
- Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: David Hrbác(
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: David Hrbác(
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Prev by Date: Re: apche vhosts ldap
- Next by Date: Network Connection Card Problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Next by thread: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Index(es):
 |