Bart Schaefer napsal(a): > This is way off-peak time for us (middle of Sunday night PDT) so I > suspect looking at this right now is not very useful, but: Well, it's really way-off now. I dare to say it's conntrack anyway. If there are client behind NAT using P2P... then 1 client can have thousands or even tens of thousand connections. Please do report during peak and net issue time. David _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: David Hrbác( <hrbac.conf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:29:10 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <6bb609560709092321x2fd5fd22v5099ddc358c9e349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <6bb609560709081703j76cc60e9oc35580a9442feb67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E4DE20.3090803@xxxxxxxxx> <6bb609560709092321x2fd5fd22v5099ddc358c9e349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- References:
- Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: David Hrbác(
- Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- From: Bart Schaefer
- Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Next by Date: kmod-drbd-smp (2.6.9-55.0.2.EL) has unknown symbols (kmod-drbd not)
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Next by thread: Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway
- Index(es):
 |