Re: Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On 9/8/07, Barry Brimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Have you checked speed and duplex settings?
>>     
>
> All NICs on all machines involved report exactly the same:
>
>   negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
>
> We've also checked ifconfig on all interfaces, and no errors, dropped
> packets, overruns, nor collisions have been recorded.
>   
You might try *not* auto-negotiating as described here:
http://mark.foster.cc/wiki/index.php/Ethtool


-- 
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP <mark@xxxxxxxxx>  http://mark.foster.cc/

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux