Re: CentOS vs RedHat packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 16:31 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> Another learning experience question - it is my understanding that CentOS 
> essentially IS RedHat but with any commercial connection removed.   That 
> being said, is there any difference in the included, or quality of 
> packages between the two distros?
> 
> I've got some basic issues with a critical server I'm about to set up, and 
> if I cannot get beyond said issues, I may opt to try CentOS.  Seeing that 
> CentOS is free (can't call RedHat for support), I'm wondering if I should 
> try and make the case for CentOS over RedHat.  Once the choice is made, it 
> may be next to impossible to revert to the other version (RH vs CentOS).

CentOS aims to be 100% binary compatible with the upstream product.
Additional or changed packages are included in the extras or plus
repositories. E.g. CentOS plus provides a modified kernel with more
options enabled, and extras the heartbeat clustering software.

-- Daniel

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux