Re: Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

[Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson@xxxxxxxx>]

> Looking at your requests on this you should realize that repotags are
> what you are really asking for the minimum level, which is what epel
> nuked to ashes. So the discussion should probably move away from this
> list to the epel list. And since it's a dead topic there as well you
> will not really get very far.

I know EPEL acknowledged that the whole repo-conflicts thing is an
issue that needed to be addressed... as has been rehashed many times,
they just didn't like repotags.

However, perhaps adding something into RPM itself could go a long way
to addressing this in a more integrated manner?

  https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg01537.html

That thread might be a good place to request that something like this
be added.

Not sure how high of a priority everyone would consider it.

Ray
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos