Steve Searle wrote:
Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled:
Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a
server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop
but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P.
Although I find Fedora stable enough to use as a server, the frequency
of having to upgrade to a new version means I find Centos a better
choice. As others have said, upgrading every 4 years or so is much
better than upgrading every year.
It is certainly less of a headache. No need to build a system just to
handle deployment (not that this is a bad thing...) once a year along
with whatever you need if you do not have that many servers and
therefore such a system would be overkill.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
