Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled:

> Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a 
> server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop 
> but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P.

Although I find Fedora stable enough to use as a server, the frequency
of having to upgrade to a new version means I find Centos a better
choice.  As others have said, upgrading every 4 years or so is much
better than upgrading every year.

I use Fedora on all my workstations, however.

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 09:27:34 up 14:06,  0 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00

Attachment: pgpVXRm3b0l3F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux