Re: motherboard recommendation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Feizhou wrote:
Thomas Harold wrote:
Robert Thompson wrote:
Feizhou wrote:
That sounds like a board with a buggy bios. For the same reason, I will avoid Asus boards since I have resort to noapic or apci=off parameters to get them to run stable.

Which Asus board? And how old is the BIOS? We've had good results with the M2N-E and M2N32-SLI Deluxe motherboards and Linux 2.6. The M2N32-SLI had some rough edges early on until Asus released a proper BIOS for the board.

Asus is finally getting their apic tables setup right? great.

A8N-VM

Pretty sure I haven't tried running Linux on one of those. That's a socket 939 ATX board with PCIe and we only own one (which is a A8N-VM CSM GeForce 6150 running WinXP).

I don't exactly remember which BIOS revision of the M2N32-SLI Deluxe has issues... but at the time I was running Gentoo and the Gentoo boards contain a good deal of information about motherboards. Once Asus released a good BIOS for it, I dropped Xen 3.0.2 on it and left it alone.

I also had an A8V motherboard (socket 939, VIA K8T800Pro chipset) that I used for about a year with a 2.6 kernel. The M2NPV-VM boards (microATX) also seemed to work (at least with the Xen 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 LiveCD which I was using to test APIC issues on the M2N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard).

(We've developed a familiarity for the Asus AM2 motherboards, so they're the primary choice for us on the workstation / desktop side. Plus they have zero moving parts and a decent feature set.)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux