Re: A question about RAID and partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Brent L. Bates wrote:

     I've found over the years any more partitioning than that is just a waste
of disk space.  If I had more partitions, I usually ended up with one
partition with a lot of excess space and others with not enough.  It was just
easier to have everything together.  On the current system we have about 600GB
of disk space available with only 5% of it used.  I'm not worried about
anything getting filled up any time soon.
     Users who fill up drives get shot and then chastised.  :-)

That's probably true for single user machine or special-purpose ones that handle a few big files, but if you are running services that have busy logfiles etc. you will end up making other things wait while the disk head keeps bouncing back and forth between the logfiles and the work you are trying to do. Putting /var on a separate drive (drive, not just partition...) to eliminate that head contention always seemed like a good idea to me. And separating /home from the head(s) handling /tmp and swap is good for the same reason if you have user activity.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux