Dan _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Dan Halbert <halbert@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:50:58 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4643E6E3.8000606@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <9573C64A-D718-4B46-A696-44647CF369EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4643E6E3.8000606@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070409)
If you are just trying to redirect HTTP traffic, I wonder if you would
find it easier to use an HTTP proxy like squid or pound. It is pretty
trivial to set up a transparent non-caching HTTP forwarder with one of
those.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Bob Chiodini
- Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- References:
- NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Jeff Potter
- Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Feizhou
- NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Prev by Date: RE: Re: Anaconda doesn't support raid10
- Next by Date: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Next by thread: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Index(es):
 |