Jeff Potter wrote:
I'm stumped.
What are you trying to achieve? Transparent proxying? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:45:39 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <9573C64A-D718-4B46-A696-44647CF369EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <9573C64A-D718-4B46-A696-44647CF369EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Dan Halbert
- Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- References:
- NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- From: Jeff Potter
- NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggestions for partition
- Next by Date: RE: Re: Anaconda doesn't support raid10
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Next by thread: Re: NAT from eth0:0 port 80 to lo port 8080?
- Index(es):
 |