Yup, that's what I do. On Mon, April 2, 2007 10:37 am, Cen Tos wrote: > I've been reading up on recommended partitioning scheme and looking at > Centos 5 beta's default scheme, it struck me that with LVM, it doesn't > matter any more as long as we leave aside enough room for /boot, does it? > Or > am I still missing something here? Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Partitioning with LVM
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Partitioning with LVM
- From: "Paul" <unix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:35:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <667c2e1e0704020737l40e4265dpf60b74339cb023cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <667c2e1e0704020737l40e4265dpf60b74339cb023cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos
- References:
- Partitioning with LVM
- From: Cen Tos
- Partitioning with LVM
- Prev by Date: Re: NTP
- Next by Date: Problem with gettid() on CentOS 5/gcc 4.1.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Partitioning with LVM
- Next by thread: Problem with gettid() on CentOS 5/gcc 4.1.1
- Index(es):
 |