_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Partitioning with LVM
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Partitioning with LVM
- From: "Cen Tos" <centos.admin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:37:11 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cFOcDeRZDCETNYAzh19uKiNwGOaP5+QPtYjYk854GOkdCRSa+/6vKWzpgyIQ0I8cbihsH1bwPEeS2/jbABpsOVmGCvnZsfgqYfMk2x+tJL8Y20P45n3c4KoH0KFdUoZLaq4kjE3BBZ0PPtBaFKdgJyNjlw4OHbJJMDhJLO5ZVE0=
I've been reading up on recommended partitioning scheme and looking at Centos 5 beta's default scheme, it struck me that with LVM, it doesn't matter any more as long as we leave aside enough room for /boot, does it? Or am I still missing something here? Thanks!
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partitioning with LVM
- From: Paul
- Re: Partitioning with LVM
- From: tblader
- Re: Partitioning with LVM
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 5 beta upgrade path
- Next by Date: Re: Software RAID 10?
- Previous by thread: Centos 5 will have full NTFS read write support?
- Next by thread: Re: Partitioning with LVM
- Index(es):
 |