Re: Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
From: Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:56:25 +0800
Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4603D36E.3060300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46026818.7000300@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4602A86F.6060606@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <etujca$pku$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4603D36E.3060300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222)

Found an article on google groups suggesting using all 4 slots is a crap
shoot.  Hmm..

:( That is valid for a host of motherboards...that fourth slot isforbidden...

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

References:
- segfaults with 8 gig of ram
  - From: tblader
- Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
  - From: tblader
- Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
  - From: Scott Silva
- Re: Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
  - From: tblader

Prev by Date: Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
Next by Date: Re: TightVNC controlling a Mac OSX 10.4.9.
Previous by thread: Re: Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram
Next by thread: CentOS 5 Beta Feels Snappier
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Development] [CentOS ARM Devel] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Carrier Grade Linux] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux