On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:08:10AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> It appears that CentOS 4.x may be the closest, based on the
> website. I am interested in maintaining a very similar user
Yes. CentOS 4.x is ultimately branched from FC3, which wasn't hugely
different from FC2.
> be /media now, I guess) /etc and similar for my network settings. I am not
> running LVM, and do not wish to. I am not running a wireless network, and
> do not wish to. I am not running a web server, nor do I wish to. I am
> running kernel 2.6.10, and I see that CentOS 4.x is 2.6.9, which I suppose
> is pretty close. I do not run SELinux, nor do I wish to.
Okay. None of those things you don't wish to do are forced on you by any
version of Fedora or CentOS.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
