On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 13:14 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Theo Band wrote: > > > > > > btw, if you're particularly keen to stat at about the RHL 7.3 level then > > > CentOS 2.1 is close, CentOS 3 is close to FC1 (I think) > > > > More RHEL9 than FC1. > > Errm. Make that RH9, I don't want to go too far into the future ... > Right ... that one is a hard call ... as it was based on RH9 with some FC1 stuff rolled in to :P
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
