Re: [CentOS] bacula rpm --rebuild on x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



ok I have it narrowed down to a handful of dependencies now

[root@tachyon ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_centos4 1"
--define "build_mysql4 1" --define "build_x86_64 1"
bacula-1.38.11-3.src.rpm
Installing bacula-1.38.11-3.src.rpm
error: Failed build dependencies:
       gtk2-devel >= 2.4 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
       libgnomeui-devel >= 2.8 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
       libart_lgpl-devel >= 2.3 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
       libbonoboui-devel >= 2.8 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64

however, I have the latest versions of these packages available on the
repos.  I'm currently using fasttrack, dag, dries, kbs-extras,
kbs-misc.  Can anyone suggest alternate repos where I might find newer
versions?

Gordon


On 11/9/06, Gordon McLellan <gordonthree@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think I found the source of the problem. I reran the yum
localinstall with debug set to 10, and I see that the "protectbase"
plugin is preventing certain packages from being updated to later
versions.  I will download and try to install the latest stable
release of bacula instead of the cutting edge beta!

My mistake, it had nothing to do with 32/64 bit

thanks,
Gordon


On 11/9/06, Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Gordon McLellan <gordonthree@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > I tried to install the latest bacula last night, rebuilding from the
> > source rpm ... this is the command line I used, following the
> > instructions at bacula.org:
> >
> > # rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_centos4 1" \
> > --define "build_x86_64 1" --define "build_mysql4 1" bacula-1.39.26-1.src.rpm
> >
> > but the rebuild fails, citing all sorts of dependencies being
> > required.   problem is, all the dependencies it mentions are for 386
> > and/or 32 bit, not x86_64.   when I try doing a yum install
> > somedependency, yum informs me it's already installed
>
> Well, in the output it provided, it never says it wants i386 versions
> of those packages.  Do you have gcc-g++ and others installed on the
> system?
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux