Re: [CentOS] bacula rpm --rebuild on x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I think I found the source of the problem. I reran the yum
localinstall with debug set to 10, and I see that the "protectbase"
plugin is preventing certain packages from being updated to later
versions.  I will download and try to install the latest stable
release of bacula instead of the cutting edge beta!

My mistake, it had nothing to do with 32/64 bit

thanks,
Gordon


On 11/9/06, Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Gordon McLellan <gordonthree@xxxxxxxxx>:

> I tried to install the latest bacula last night, rebuilding from the
> source rpm ... this is the command line I used, following the
> instructions at bacula.org:
>
> # rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_centos4 1" \
> --define "build_x86_64 1" --define "build_mysql4 1" bacula-1.39.26-1.src.rpm
>
> but the rebuild fails, citing all sorts of dependencies being
> required.   problem is, all the dependencies it mentions are for 386
> and/or 32 bit, not x86_64.   when I try doing a yum install
> somedependency, yum informs me it's already installed

Well, in the output it provided, it never says it wants i386 versions
of those packages.  Do you have gcc-g++ and others installed on the
system?

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux