Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 04:01:45PM +0100, Peter Crighton enlightened
> us:
>>> We are running backup softwares for incrementals/differentials and
>>> full backups with variouse softwares currently using dirvish
>>> scripts + amanda .. what is everyones views on other opensourced
>>> backup software? is there anything better or other options we have
>>> missed? We are looking at backula as an option? any thoughts?
>>
>> I am looking for the answer to the same question. I have got amanda
>> going (but not used in anger - just doing my first Centos install for
>> my home server). Just today got amanda to write and restore some
>> data.
>>
>> So my requirements:
>>
>> * cheap/free
>> * multiple backups per tape
>> * fully automated backup each day
>> * easy recovery (happy with either a Kdat type GUI or amanda type) -
>> needs to know which tape to recover the latest (or chosen) version.
>> * ideal for a home network (mixed Linux Windows)
>>
>>
>>
>> The only thing I don't like about amanda (so far) is that it needs a
>> new tape each backup, mainly because I'd like it to be a completely
>> automatic backup, only requiring the tape to be changed when full
>> (or maybe each month).
>>
>> I typically don't backup much data each day (because it's a home
>> network), so I'd like to be able to store multiple backups on each
>> tape. I have 20GB Travan tape drive, so that's enough for a complete
>> full backup and several incremental's.
>>
>
> If you have enough holding disk, just leave the tape out until you
> hit about 20GB worth of data. I do this here at work on a weekly
> basis - holding disk is a pair of RAID 1 disks, then once a week I
> pop a tape in and it flushes the entire week's worth of data.
>
> Matt
If you have 20GB of data, using tapes is OK. In my case, I have about 3TB of
data that needs to be backed up, and taken offsite. So, the only real option
is rsync going out to disks. We started out with using one of the recipes
from the Linux Server Hacks book, #38, #41 & #42 to essentially build up a
poor man's SAN. Using CentOS installed on systems with 3Ware cards, I have 2
onsite 4 TB NAS. The first one is for network use, the second is for hourly,
daily and weekly snapshots of the main NAS. There's a third 4TB NAS that's
located offsite in a colo facility that's fed with dual T1s. We can have
anywhere from 2-5 GB of data change every day. We're a company of about 50
employees, and we do legal work - so nothing can be thrown away.
This system runs 7 days a week, and it's fully automated with email alerts,
etc. The big benefit is restores. We've had our graphics dept accidently
delete 250GB of data, and it was trivial to scp the missing data back to the
main NAS. It all happened at network speeds, over a GB switch. All the NASes
have dual NICS in them, and the second NICS are connected to their own
private GB switch - hence the poor man's SAN. When hourly snapshots run, all
the data that changes has a seperate GB network to move the data, leaving
the office network alone. No user can tell that backups are happening
throughout the day.
Maybe this is something I should write up in more detail. The entire system
runs on just a couple of shell scripts, rsync, and Perl program to mail out
logs....
HTH
Mark
Mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
