Re: [CentOS] yum vs up2date

[Paul <subsolar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:07 +0800, John Summerfied wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 13:34 +0800, John Summerfied wrote:
> 
> 
> > FC3 is past end of life, does it matter :)
> >
> FC3 is
> a) The version of FC3 I know best
> b) What RHEL4 is based on
> c) Supported by Fedora Legacy
> 
> OTOH FC5 is basically broken and I'm thinking of replacing it with Suse 
> 10.1 on at least one system:-)

FC5 broken?
Funny I use it every day as a desktop.

SUSE 10.1 every install I've tried won't update correctly without manual
intervention to get the updater working. ::SIGH:: Maybe 10.2 will be
worth looking at.

Paul

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos