On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:39 +0200, Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Friday 18 August 2006 15:17, William L. Maltby wrote: > > ... > > Just wanted you to know that you had the option of no partition and no > > lvm. > > I agree that this should work, but I've seen some strange behaviour when > trying it with large devices and would as such recommend against it. Even more, raw has only 1 basic advantage: max space and speed. But LVM seems to have little enough overhead that all its advantages become predominate in my mind. I never use raw anymore, regardless of size. I am too much in love with things like vgextend, vgreduce, ... that allow easy adjustments as the environmental needs change. I am even using it as a SOHO cheap, fast backup and "instant recover" vehicle. A little more dev and I'm done (for *my* needs). > > /Peter > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
