On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 16:31 -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0400, William L. Maltby enlightened us: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:39:55PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > <snip> > You need to make sure you understand that the "name" does not contain .rf, > .plus or otherwise. That is (generally) part of the Release String. RPMs are > named in a Name-Version-Release.Arch pattern. Knew that it was not an official field. Presummed some parsing would be needed. Just part of the jon if one chooses to go that way. > > This has been discussed on the yum mailing list previously, and it is > difficult (at best) to track what repository an RPM came from, especially > when RPMs are installed by hand, repositories are removed, etc. The RPM > database does not allow for this information in its current implementation. > > In order to implement what you suggest above goes beyond yum into RPM-land. > Either way, this probably isn't the right mailing list for this discussion. Yep. I always get seduced by all the apparently OT threads we see without complaint. So I just jump right in with my own OT thread. > > Matt > -- Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
