Re: [CentOS] new clamav update miss 'clamav' user/group creation/update

["J.J.Garcia" <stigmatedbrain@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Is that a provisional issue?
>>
>> I mean, IMHO there's no point in maintaining this two releases of the
>> same
>> thing/pkg in different repositories, unless you name them different to be
>> seleccted as appropiate (not exclude tag involved).
> 
> 
> These aren't centos repositories. We don't maintain them and they do
> not come from the .centos.org domain. Dag does the rpmforge.net
> repository and is receptive to input from the community as to what
> packages they'd like to see. Karanbir maintains his own project which
> is a rebuild of fedora extras for Centos. The more repositories you
> add, the more duplication you're likely to run into. This is why what
> Johnny suggested above is a good idea.

Sure, i start thinking it's the best option in the actual environment.

> 
>> If so, how many pkgs are going to be like this way? It seems to me it
>> could be a
>> nightmare, but this is only my opinion. Hints allowed.
> 
> 
> A few.
> yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo rpmforge list available > dag
> yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo kbs-extras list available > kbs
> 
> then have a look through and compare the two.
> 
> 
I take note,

Thx Jim & John




_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos