Is that a provisional issue? I mean, IMHO there's no point in maintaining this two releases of the same thing/pkg in different repositories, unless you name them different to be seleccted as appropiate (not exclude tag involved).
These aren't centos repositories. We don't maintain them and they do not come from the .centos.org domain. Dag does the rpmforge.net repository and is receptive to input from the community as to what packages they'd like to see. Karanbir maintains his own project which is a rebuild of fedora extras for Centos. The more repositories you add, the more duplication you're likely to run into. This is why what Johnny suggested above is a good idea.
If so, how many pkgs are going to be like this way? It seems to me it could be a nightmare, but this is only my opinion. Hints allowed.
A few. yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo rpmforge list available > dag yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo kbs-extras list available > kbs then have a look through and compare the two. -- This message has been double ROT13 encoded for security. Anyone other than the intended recipient attempting to decode this message will be in violation of the DMCA _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
