Kurt Hansen wrote: > > Jim Perrin wrote: > >>> In fact, the quality of the perl-related rpms from Red Hat is >>> the main reason I'm not using RHEL and using CentOS >> >> Your logic is confusing to me. It does not resemble what I would >> consider to be rational thought. > > Is this the kind of rhetoric that is acceptable on this list? There is > no value to your comment except to insult. you are much confused, Kurt, as to what CentOS is and what packaging policy with this distro is. I suggest you spend some time working that out. this isnt a Gentoo derevative, and never will be either. > Do you have any experience with the rpms to which I'm referring? Do you > work with the same software I do? well, considering you dont know much about the distro you are using, it seems sort of academic to raise this question on your part. as for the original poster, I'll attempt to upgrade the DVD::RIP on my site - but i *know* there are version conflicts with upstream perl modules required in the dep-chain and centos perl-pkgs / rpmforge perl-packages. Details to follow shortly. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos