On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:53 -0500, David Thompson wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version: > > kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 > > Excellent. Is there a general way to map from upstream errata kernels to > centosplus kernels? The (apparently??) previous convention of suffixing > .106.unsupported to the upstream release number seemed to work well, and I > don't want to either guess or take up mailing list bandwidth asking every time > upstream revs. It worked great .... except when this update came :) 2.6.9-34.106.unsupported .... RH puts out 2.6.9-34.0.1 2.6.9-34.0.1.106.unsupported IS not an upgrade for 2.6.9-34.106.unsupported .... since 106 > 0 :) For a more detail discussion ... see this post from last week :) http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-May/065273.html Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
