Re: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855

[David Thompson <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version:
> kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4

Excellent.  Is there a general way to map from upstream errata kernels to 
centosplus kernels?  The (apparently??) previous convention of suffixing 
.106.unsupported to the upstream release number seemed to work well, and I 
don't want to either guess or take up mailing list bandwidth asking every time 
upstream revs.

>However ... if the only thing you need from the centosplus kernel is the
>xfs ... you should use the normal (non-centosplus) kernel and the
>kernel-xfs-module that matches it from here:
>
>http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/
>
>or
>
>http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/

Ooooh.  That would be cool.  I'll look into it.

Thanks again.

Dave Thompson
UW-Madison


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos