On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:34, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> If that is all your users will have to do on the server, I recommend
> using proftpd with virtual users.
Having used both proftpd and vsftpd, they *seem* to be about feature
equivalent. Is there any case where one would be preferrable to the other?
Why?
Unfortunately, I had a bad experience with ProFTPd - a RedHat 7.x server
otherwise maintained with yum was compromised due to a flaw in ProFTPd,
because I missed that ProFTPd had been installed from source and wasn't being
updated.
It's my bad, so I'm not really downing ProFTPd, but it does make clear to me
that it's usually preferrable to use whatever the distro comes with, even if
competing packages have a generally better security record, if only because
of the assurance of timely security patches and updates.
When you install from source, you're married to that package from then on, and
have to maintain it until the end of time! But, when you install a distro
RPM, the good folks at RedHat and CentOS effectively maintain it. That's a
*good thing*, since they'll most assuredly do a better job at it.
Over the years, I've gotten *very* conservative about what I install!
-Ben
--
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
- XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978
