Vincent Knecht wrote on Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:18:26 +0100: > Some little research told me that some '/bin/false' versions have no real > 'login' capacity, but dunno about CentOS' one. Aha, thanks. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
/bin/false as a login shell -- sorry
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: /bin/false as a login shell -- sorry
- From: maillists at conactive.com (Kai Schaetzl)
- Date: Thu Mar 23 00:31:27 2006
- In-reply-to: <200603222018.26607.vknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <VA.000020c0.01c67a8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200603222005.34797.vknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200603222018.26607.vknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- /bin/false as a login shell
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- /bin/false as a login shell
- From: Vincent Knecht
- /bin/false as a login shell -- sorry
- From: Vincent Knecht
- /bin/false as a login shell
- Prev by Date: /bin/false as a login shell
- Next by Date: Cannot start sm-client on CentOS
- Previous by thread: /bin/false as a login shell -- sorry
- Next by thread: Sendmail Security update
- Index(es):
 |