/bin/false as a login shell

[maillists at conactive.com (Kai Schaetzl)]

I see that /bin/false is not a valid shell by default on CentOS. It is 
f.i. on Suse. /bin/false is present, though. Is there a security reason 
for this? man says that nologin gives feedback that the account is not 
available while false just exits false. Anything against just adding 
/bin/false to /etc/shells?

Kai

-- 
Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com