Request for good advice to upgrade kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:05:46PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > kernel 2.6.9-34.EL still is based on kernel.org's 2.6.9 kernel, but has at
> > > least 700 patches in it (that is added up for all architectures, so your
> > > i386 kernel doesn't really have 700 patches applied to it). But the
> > > kernel-API is still the same as in 2.6.9 (later 2.6.x kernels have a
> > > different one).
> > 
> > And there you are wrong.
> > 
> > I give you the exemple of slmodemd, where you have to change it so it
> > detects the CentOS kernel as if it were 2.6.10+. Otherwise, it won't
> > even compile, due to difference on the headers.
> 
> Hmmmm. Compiled fine without any changes here. slmodemd-2.9.10 that is.

Are you sure that was the stock slmodemd, and not the "abby" version ?
The "abby" version is already patched to work on RHEL4.

In any case, the version I had to patch was 2.9.9d.

[]s

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEIB/0pdyWzQ5b5ckRAhBgAKCeW8wlHjF54mr5nD/2jji3WOb6JgCdHLa0
U0E71EayU/cz/Uo3aR8YEd8=
=ZkGd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux