Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:05:46PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > kernel 2.6.9-34.EL still is based on kernel.org's 2.6.9 kernel, but has at
> > least 700 patches in it (that is added up for all architectures, so your
> > i386 kernel doesn't really have 700 patches applied to it). But the
> > kernel-API is still the same as in 2.6.9 (later 2.6.x kernels have a
> > different one).
>
> And there you are wrong.
>
> I give you the exemple of slmodemd, where you have to change it so it
> detects the CentOS kernel as if it were 2.6.10+. Otherwise, it won't
> even compile, due to difference on the headers.
Hmmmm. Compiled fine without any changes here. slmodemd-2.9.10 that is.
Ralph
--
Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 M?nchen | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other
Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060321/14ec19d0/attachment.bin
