freenx

[lesmikesell at gmail.com (Les Mikesell)]

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 15:57, Maciej ?enczykowski wrote:

> I've read through the thread you provided and I'm not convinced.  Indeed 
> it still seems like a bad design decision to me.  Why isn't the normal ssh 
> authentication good enough for NX? 

I think the idea was to have a minimally-privileged program that
can't do anything but provide a tunnel.

> And if there is some need for a 
> different authentication than it should still - also support normal ssh by 
> default for all the other cases - like mine - where it's not needed.

That's probably possible if you want to work at it.  I don't see
why all the components of the server couldn't run as you if you
trust them not to delete your files - unless sessions for different
users share a cache of some sort.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx