Re: Trouble with kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Has this been solved? Is there a bug report I can follow?
Thank you for letting me know,

Valère Binet

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:23 PM Bill Gee <bgee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On the other hand ---  I just upgraded one of my CentOS7 systems to
> 3.10.0-1160.80.1 today.  With that kernel it will not run any KVM guest.
>   The system hangs - HARD - within one or two seconds of issuing the
> "virsh start ..." command.  It hangs so hard that a power-off restart
> using the back panel switch is required.  It does not log any error I
> can find, nor display any message about a kernel panic.
>
> Rebooting with 3.10.0-1160.76.1 works fine.
>
> The system is an older SuperMicro mainboard with a Q9400 processor.
>
> ===============
> Bill Gee
>
> On 11/16/22 12:38, Chris Schanzle via CentOS wrote:
> > On 11/15/22 7:50 PM, Petko Alov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>             Is anyone else experiencing trouble with
> >>>             kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64?
> >>>
> >>>             I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of
> >>> our VM hosts with
> >>>
> >>>             it.
> >>>
> >>>             I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it seems
> >>> to work fine with
> >>>
> >>>             the
> >>>             older kernel (.76.1).
> >>>
> >>>         Where did you get the .80.1 kernel from? I'm a bit confused
> >>> because I can
> >>>
> >>>         only see .76.1 on my systems.
> >>>
> >>>         Simon
> >>>
> >>>     I'm actually running Scientific Linux, which seems to be a little
> >>> ahead here.
> >>> Probably not related, but vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64
> >>> (AlmaLinux 8.6) had a kernel panic on a Intel Xeon E5504 processor,
> >>> but works fine on Xeon E56XX processors (5620 specifically in our
> >>> tests). * Believe from kernel version, the original email is for
> >>> Centos 7, possible the same change that went into the EL8 kernel went
> >>> also to EL7 Triggered right after I used virsh start to start the vm.
> >>> (Caused Black Screen, and reboot. Found this in the crashed kernel
> >>> logs on /var/crash) Works fine on
> >>> vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64 and
> >>> vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64
> >>
> >> In fact, related - on our systems attempt to start qemu-kvm VM under
> >> kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 freezes any of 5 workstations with
> >> dual E5507 (all worked OK under kernel-3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 and
> >> any previous version). The workstations with E5-2609, E5-2650 or
> >> E5-2630 are not affected - all of them run qemu-kvm VM under
> >> kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 without problems.
> >>
> >
> > Thankfully, no problems with 2x Xeon E5-2667 v2 and CentOS 7.9 kernel
> > 3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux