Has this been solved? Is there a bug report I can follow? Thank you for letting me know, Valère Binet On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:23 PM Bill Gee <bgee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On the other hand --- I just upgraded one of my CentOS7 systems to > 3.10.0-1160.80.1 today. With that kernel it will not run any KVM guest. > The system hangs - HARD - within one or two seconds of issuing the > "virsh start ..." command. It hangs so hard that a power-off restart > using the back panel switch is required. It does not log any error I > can find, nor display any message about a kernel panic. > > Rebooting with 3.10.0-1160.76.1 works fine. > > The system is an older SuperMicro mainboard with a Q9400 processor. > > =============== > Bill Gee > > On 11/16/22 12:38, Chris Schanzle via CentOS wrote: > > On 11/15/22 7:50 PM, Petko Alov wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>> > >>> On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote: > >>> > >>> Is anyone else experiencing trouble with > >>> kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? > >>> > >>> I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of > >>> our VM hosts with > >>> > >>> it. > >>> > >>> I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it seems > >>> to work fine with > >>> > >>> the > >>> older kernel (.76.1). > >>> > >>> Where did you get the .80.1 kernel from? I'm a bit confused > >>> because I can > >>> > >>> only see .76.1 on my systems. > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> I'm actually running Scientific Linux, which seems to be a little > >>> ahead here. > >>> Probably not related, but vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 > >>> (AlmaLinux 8.6) had a kernel panic on a Intel Xeon E5504 processor, > >>> but works fine on Xeon E56XX processors (5620 specifically in our > >>> tests). * Believe from kernel version, the original email is for > >>> Centos 7, possible the same change that went into the EL8 kernel went > >>> also to EL7 Triggered right after I used virsh start to start the vm. > >>> (Caused Black Screen, and reboot. Found this in the crashed kernel > >>> logs on /var/crash) Works fine on > >>> vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64 and > >>> vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64 > >> > >> In fact, related - on our systems attempt to start qemu-kvm VM under > >> kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 freezes any of 5 workstations with > >> dual E5507 (all worked OK under kernel-3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 and > >> any previous version). The workstations with E5-2609, E5-2650 or > >> E5-2630 are not affected - all of them run qemu-kvm VM under > >> kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 without problems. > >> > > > > Thankfully, no problems with 2x Xeon E5-2667 v2 and CentOS 7.9 kernel > > 3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos