Re: Any downside to mount -o noatime?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



--On Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:49 PM -0500 Jon LaBadie <jcu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

atime updates that occur when {m,c}time are updated add
no additional burden.

Understood. If that's the only time it happened, I would be happy with that.

So you are concerned about a single "possible" inode update
once a day?

I'm using BackupPC to do rsync-based backups of all my systems. The "incremental" backups look only at size and timestamp changes. The less-frequent "full" backups checksum all my files. That means an extra write for every file that gets checked.

I'd love to have a version of relatime that only did the first kind of update, when ctime or mtime changed but not when 24 hours had passed.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux