> > No idea why the other is not released to c8s, I will ask. > Thank you! We will test when we see the CentOS Stream updates coming, and we will let you know if we notice anything special. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- From: Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:28:36 +0100
- In-reply-to: <e2903da8-9683-4bff-20a1-223f864e070f@centos.org>
- References: <CAH7BiJgC3dah+J+c1omkize_oD-rcq85GPPjMzuyzvGt8Rbh3w@mail.gmail.com> <e2903da8-9683-4bff-20a1-223f864e070f@centos.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- References:
- 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- From: Mathieu Baudier
- Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- From: Johnny Hughes
- 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel live patching on CentOS Stream 9
- Next by Date: HP Microserver Gen 10+ video RHEL8
- Previous by thread: Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- Next by thread: Re: 389-ds packages less up-to-date on CentOS Stream 8 than RHEL8
- Index(es):
 |