Re: Centos versions in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Il 2021-04-30 21:16 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Critics of Stream often argue that CentOS users are losing support
that CentOS never had to begin with.  Their argument implies that
CentOS has aspects of RHEL that it does not.  They are not correct.

From here [1]:
"Since March 2004, CentOS Linux has been a community-supported distribution derived from sources freely provided to the public by Red Hat. As such, CentOS Linux aims to be functionally compatible with RHEL. We mainly change packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork. CentOS Linux is no-cost and free to redistribute."

Does it means that CentOS was appropriate on all scenario? No. Was CentOS making hard promises about their support or existence? No. So it is *fine* for classical CentOS to disappear if the developer / owner want that. Long live Stream!

But stating that Stream is functionally equivalent to CentOS is not correct. Fact is that the CentOS team did a wonderful work at repackage RHEL, so 99.9% of times it just worked. And it worked for all the time the corresponding RHEL was supported (7 or 10 years). In return, RedHat (and so CentOS) got much testing and bug-report (I alone reported my fair share of bugs, some with hours/days spent try to reliably reproduce and tracking down them).

Now, with a moving kernel, you simply can't provide this level of confidence. DKMS is not a silver bullet. See here [2] for an example. Rebooting your kernel and finding you can't access your storage is a quite a significant problem, no? And when I migrated a test machine to Stream some months ago, even something as basic as dnf had its issues. While I hope that now the situation is better, I hardly can see Stream equivalent to old CentOS.

Regards.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20200721184556/https://www.centos.org/about/ [2] https://listman.redhat.com/archives/vdo-devel/2021-January/msg00005.html


Does that make sense?  Please, go back and read my earlier message
again.  You seem to think I am complaining that CentOS is not
supported, but I am not.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux