On 12/15/20 10:30 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:24 PM Tom Bishop <bishoptf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 11:06 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think there will be a course change either, but for different
reasons. The motivation isn't "cashing/selling out". It's... actually the
stated motivation
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q2
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, but
they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose
not to. Ya know, if it walks like a duck and quacks as a duck...who knows
maybe this goes down as one of the best decisions ever for RH but I think
its going to hurt them in more ways then they ever thought about.
_______________________________________________
Not to mention the constant barrage of "You just want free Red Hat" and
"CentOS users are moochers" and "We deserve value from all those CentOS
users, so we're going to turn them into beta testers for RHEL." I have
gotten these responses here and on twitter from CentOS and Red Hat
employees.
Yup, a lot of "Centos Users" are the ones running and building for RHEL
infrastructure, there's a lot more in it for IBM to take over RHEL than
there is to take over Ubuntu, mint or build something new. The thought
more than likely is "an established market is already out there".
I don't think that IBM is in the business of "Hey let's do something
really nice, because we don't really need/want the money"
So, sorry, but this line about this not being a money grab is an obvious
crock of excrement.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
