Re: ssacli start rebuild?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 12:08 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> Am Fr., 6. Nov. 2020 um 00:52 Uhr schrieb hw <hw@xxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > [...]
> >       logicaldrive 1 (14.55 TB, RAID 1+0, Ready for Rebuild)
> > [...]
> 
> Have you checked the rebuild priority:
> 
> ❯ ssacli ctrl slot=0 show config detail | grep "Rebuild Priority"
>                                                       ~
>    Rebuild Priority: Medium
>
> 
> Slot needs to be adjusted to your configuration.

Yes, I've set it to high:


ssacli ctrl slot=3 show config detail | grep Prior
   Rebuild Priority: High
   Expand Priority: Medium


Some search results indicate that it's possible that other disks in the
array have read errors and might prevent rebuilding for RAID 5.  I don't
know if there are read errors, and if it's read errors, I think it would
mean that these errors would have to affect just the disk which is
mirroring the disk that failed, this being a RAID 1+0.  But if the RAID
is striped across all the disks, that could be any or all of them.

The array is still in production and still works, so it should just rebuild.
Now the plan is to use another 8TB disk once it arrives, make a new RAID 1
with the two new disks and copy the data over.  The remaining 4TB disks can
then be used to make a new array.

Learn from this that it can be a bad idea to use a RAID 0 for backups and that
least one generation of backups must be on redundant storage ...


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux