Re: Blog article about the state of CentOS

[John Pierce <jhn.pierce@xxxxxxxxx>]

but the build process should be the same, no?    I can't believe RH would
use a completely different build process for the release than for the
beta/development stuff.



On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:36 PM Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 21/06/20 9:15 am, John Pierce wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 4:08 AM Tom Bishop <bishoptf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Streams is not for a production workload, if I wanted that I can
> easily
> >> deploy an Arch instance if I want or need a rolling distro (it's not
> Redhat
> >> etc but still). If Redhat wanted CentOS to be released near the same
> time
> >> line they could help make that happen, although that wouldn't be in
> there
> >> best financial interest.
> >
> >
> > think of it this way ... when the rolling beta is done, the final release
> > will be done with no further delay.
>
> No, Stream and the core OS are built form a completely separate set of
> sources.  I highly doubt that we could use binaries built from stream to
> populate the final release.  The whole thing has to be rebuilt for the
> final release regardless of the status of Stream.
>
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos