Re: Blog article about the state of CentOS

[Jon Pruente <jpruente@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:41 AM Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> This is all well and good, but I don't think that CentOS was ever meant
> to be a testing ground for RHEL.  As the name actually stands for it is
> a "Community Enterprise OS" and it has always been a rebuild of the RHEL
> sources.  Stream is basically RHEL Rolling Beta, and that can hardly be
> considered "Enterprise".
>
> I and I think many others find this focus on Stream to be rather
> distressing, and it does have the appearance to be taking focus away
> from the core OS.  This is further evidenced by the long wait times for
> release.
>

I have to shake my head at this. You're telling the guy who builds, and had
built, CentOS for years what the project is and where it is going? He told
you what Stream is and what it will be used for already. It is the new
future of the OS. That's it. You're arguing semantics about having
Enterprise in the name, while ignoring that it's still Enterprise Linux,
even if it's not the final end product because it is the future source
project of Enterprise Linux.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos