Re: Blog article about the state of CentOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 20/06/20 3:50 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Your dates are significantly off
Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table:

It is, for CentOS-7, For example:

7.0  27
7.1  26
7.2  25
7.3  39
7.4  43
7.5  31
7.6  34
7.7  42
7.8  28


For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days.

For 8:

8.0  140
8.1  71
8.2  48

So the delays for 8 are significantly longer than they ever were for 7.

And EL8 is exponentially harder with an entirely new build system and
the requirement to build modules.

But it seems like every major release has had reasons to be exponentially harder than the last. With 7 it was the shift to using the git sources instead of the SRPMS that were previously provided by Red Hat, thereby necessitating an entirely new build system, plus the change to systemd and the introduction of a new point release numbering scheme, not to mention the move to entirely new infrastructure because of the change to Red Hat sponsorship. So given those I find it hard to believe that the changes in 8 are so much different as to have had such longer delays than 7.

I'd also like to point out something else, from:
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x#Current_Timeline_8.2.2004

It would appear that the package build was completed on the 4th of May, why didn't we get a CR repo dump this time around so that CentOS users wouldn't have to wait another month before getting critical updates?


Peter
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux