Re: Blog article about the state of CentOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The answer is not inherently in the distribution itself. Make your
> analysis about your needs an requirements and the choice is then yours.
> 
> One could argue that the gap between disclosure of one security issues
> and the update via RHEL subscription is to big. Then a contract with
> the upstream developer of the corresponding software component is a
> better choice then relying in RHEL, right?

Of course.   My only question is whether the observation that the gap for CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.  I'm certainly not, and I don't think anyone is, claiming that the CentOS teams owes us any particular response time.  I just want to know if the claim that it's systematically significantly longer for 8 than 7 is in fact (empirically) true.

						Noam
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux