Re: CentOS 7 : SELinux trouble with Fail2ban

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2/26/20 12:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:06, Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Le 26/02/2020 à 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file
disable.
*****  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests   *****
If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the
disable file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# ausearch -c 'f2b/server' --raw | audit2allow -M my-f2bserver
# semodule -i my-f2bserver.pp
Weirdly enough, when I follow this suggestion and then empty audit.log
and restart my server, I still get the exact same error again.

I reinstalled this server from scratch and took some notes. This time I
was successful, though I don't know exactly what I did differently this
time.

Usually I work as non-root user and call sudo whenever I need root
permissions.

But is this OK when enabling SELinux modules? Let's consider the example
given above:

# ausearch -c 'f2b/server' --raw | audit2allow -M my-f2bserver
# semodule -i my-f2bserver.pp

Can I also perform it like this?

$ sudo ausearch -c 'f2b/server' --raw | sudo audit2allow -M my-f2bserver
$ sudo semodule -i my-f2bserver.pp

I'm not sure with SELinux.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777562
  This bug was posted earlier. Sadly, it was closed WONTFIX, but the policy
you need is:

allow fail2ban_t sysfs_t:file { getattr open read };
allow fail2ban_t sysctl_net_t:dir { search };
allow fail2ban_t sysctl_net_t:file { getattr open read };
Honestly, if this really affects all users of fail2ban, I’ll probably push
back on the ticket to get it updated. I’ve successfully had the policy
updated to handle issues with popular non-RHEL/CentOS packages.


So I am thinking that packages are probably going to start having to carry
around their own policies to fix things like this. Nagios had to start
doing this a couple of years ago and it might be occurring on all branches.

This is certainly the plan for fail2ban - but the bundled SELinux packaging guidelines currently make use of conditional dependencies so that's not going to fly for EL7. And unfortunately since RHEL7 is in maintenance the selinux-policy package isn't going to be updated either.


--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux