Hi,
Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. One of the users on this
list suggested that it might be due to the fact that I'm using a bone-headed
iptables script instead of FirewallD.
I've spent the past few weeks getting up to date with doing things in a more
orthodox manner. So currently my internet-facing CentOS server has a nicely
configured NetworkManager, and FirewallD has replaced the iptables script.
Unfortunately when I install FirewallD from EPEL, I still get the same error.
SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable.
***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests *****
If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the disable file
by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# ausearch -c 'f2b/server' --raw | audit2allow -M my-f2bserver
# semodule -i my-f2bserver.pp
Weirdly enough, when I follow this suggestion and then empty audit.log and
restart my server, I still get the exact same error again.
Which makes Fail2ban unusable with SELinux in enforcing mode in the current state.
Any suggestions ?
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
