Re: ssm vs. lvm: moving physical drives and volume group to another system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 2:02 PM Mike <1100100@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is that first entry /dev/mapper/lvol001 right?
> > I'd expect /dev/mapper/lvm_pool-lvo001
>
> ssm list shows -
>
> /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001
>
> When I place /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001 into /etc/fstab the computer will
> boot using kernel 514.
> Kernel 862 still hangs/panics.
>
>
I don't have an answer to why kernel 514 is not booting,
but what I was trying to say is:

/dev/lvm_pool/lvol001
and
/dev/mapper/lvm_pool-lvol001
are both symlinks to the same /dev/dm-X device file.
You can use either name, but the one you listed was missing the volume
group name
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux