On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not
>>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the
>>> openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to
>>> install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for
>>> many different reasons.
>>
>> I installed it by downloading the rpm and installing that. IBM said on
>> my older FF the app/plugin is called JNLP and I should change the
>> setting for that to 'always ask' and then when it asks use javaws - I
>> did that but it still fails.
>
> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
> to make sure, that the right java version is activated.
This is what I get from that:
application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.5 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.6 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.7 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.8 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.8.0_50 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.5 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.6 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.7 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.8 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.8.0_50 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-vm-npruntime IcedTea
> But normally javaws is a different topic. As far as i remember, there
> should be an option to let firefox ask, which javaws should be executed.
> As i understand, you have different version installed.
When this was working before the firmware update the RC software
invoked IcedTea. As one of the attempted fixes IBM suggested using
javaws instead. Intially I did not have javaws but I did have
javaws.itweb. I tried that and it failed in the same way.
Then they asked me to run this:
alternatives --config java
There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.
Selection Command
-----------------------------------------------
*+ 1 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
2 /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jav
And switch to the second one. When I did that it still failed with
IcedTea, but then there was a javaws. I ran that and it did completely
different things and finally failed with "Login error". They they had
me go into ControlPanel and put the IP address of the IMM in the
excpetion site list. I did that and then I get: KVM Java: Duplicate
exists. Then they gave up and said they don't know.
> And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
> version are more restricted about security settings.
I don't seem to have jcontrol
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
