On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell <larry.martell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote: >>> >>>> Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser. >>> >>> Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays. >>> >>> if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'. >>> >>> here - configured for older HP ILOs - for example, the plugin is linked >>> into my firefox profile: >>> >>> [ulf@bob ~]$ ll .mozilla/firefox/ln5frqem.default/plugins >>> total 0 >>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 ulf ulf 37 Apr 21 2016 libnpjp2.so -> >>> /opt/jre1.7.0_51/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so >> >> I am running a very old versiond of FF, 24.6.0, and the menus and >> files are different. But I do not have a java plugin. But please note >> that this used to work until today when I upgraded the firmware in the >> IMM. That changed the java version required, so I updated that. But >> the FF version and config has not changed. > > So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not > configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the > openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to > install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for > many different reasons. I installed it by downloading the rpm and installing that. IBM said on my older FF the app/plugin is called JNLP and I should change the setting for that to 'always ask' and then when it asks use javaws - I did that but it still fails. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos