Pasi Pirhonen wrote: > I ment more like that most times ia64, s390, s390x has been ready > before i386, but not released due the fack that 'it might confuse users Hi Pasi, Working together, we can basically ensure that the i386/x86_64/ia64 are all done and released together for 4.2. There should be no problems with that. The other slower ARCH's can come when they are ready. If in the event that i386 is ready first, I will make sure that its held back till x86_64 and IA64 catch up. Based on how we have been working, I cant imagine anyone having to really wait for much time. Ideal situation would be to have all ARCH's release together, but we dont have either the infrastructure or the people required to achieve that. btw, you think we will see a s390(x) for 4.2 ? - K -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
CentOS 4U2 timing.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: mail-lists at karan.org (Karanbir Singh)
- Date: Thu Sep 15 08:49:28 2005
- In-reply-to: <20050915074819.GB1077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200509141754.31515.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <1126738335.5550.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050915042509.GA1077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43290B00.5090504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050915074819.GB1077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Pasi Pirhonen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- References:
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Lamar Owen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Johnny Hughes
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Pasi Pirhonen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Hilliard, Jay
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Pasi Pirhonen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Prev by Date: Portsentry
- Next by Date: automount[18592]: failed to mount /home/.hidden
- Previous by thread: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Next by thread: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Index(es):
 |